Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> A further objection is aimed ad the claim that "we can be in a superposition" and it is: "If we can be in a superposition, why aren't we aware of it?"

Sounds rather like the fish being unaware of water. What would not being in a superposition feel like?

> Decoherence, for example, simply asserts that we cannot be aware of quantum effects except via interference phenomena. Why not? Why can't we be directly conscious of the various incoherent components of the wavefunction in the same sense of directly that I am directly conscious of my cat sitting beside me? [1] I don't have to do any fancy interferometry or statistical inference to be aware of the cat, so why do I have to mess about with statistics and interferometry to be aware of the wavefunction, given I myself am described by one?

So "you" is a quantum computer or something behaving like one, right? For you to "be aware of" a wavefunction, you'd have to causally interact with it. And that's very hard because of e.g. the no-cloning theorem; all you can do is entangle a qbit in your head with the qbit you're trying to measure, but what does that actually get you? What does that subjectively feel like? What operation would you expect to be able to perform that you can't?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: