1) so much non-fringe it boggles my mind. This is basic.
2) let's say 50% fringe, at most.
3) 25% fringe. Most of the relevant science buys into this, and not just b/c it sounds nice.
4) Reasonable conclusion, if the stated theory was true. 25% fringe.
5) This is a multiplication of uncertain conclusions, so let's go with 75% fringe.
6) A conclusion of 5), which would be detectable. At most as much fringe points as 5), since it can be falsified.
There's always wikipedia to grasp basics, and then there's Ethan Siegwl with Starts with a Bang, and if you're still interested there's a lot more including astronomy and physics papers. astronomy.stackexchange.com, physics.stackexchange.com and even your local university.
Edit: Since this has been downvoted, I'm genuinely interested in the reasons and especially the facts you obviously have which I don't. Please let me know where I was wrong!
2) let's say 50% fringe, at most.
3) 25% fringe. Most of the relevant science buys into this, and not just b/c it sounds nice.
4) Reasonable conclusion, if the stated theory was true. 25% fringe.
5) This is a multiplication of uncertain conclusions, so let's go with 75% fringe.
6) A conclusion of 5), which would be detectable. At most as much fringe points as 5), since it can be falsified.
There's always wikipedia to grasp basics, and then there's Ethan Siegwl with Starts with a Bang, and if you're still interested there's a lot more including astronomy and physics papers. astronomy.stackexchange.com, physics.stackexchange.com and even your local university.
Edit: Since this has been downvoted, I'm genuinely interested in the reasons and especially the facts you obviously have which I don't. Please let me know where I was wrong!